Table of Contents
Page
Part I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 3
Rationale………………………………………………………………………………. 3
Aims of the study……………………………………………………………………... 4
Scope of the study…………………………………………………………………….. 6
Methods of the study…………………………………………………………………. 6
Format of the study…………………………………………………………………… 7
Part II. Development…………………………………………………………………. 9
Chapter I: Theoretical background…………………………………………………… 10
I.1. Metaphor and cognition………………………………………………………….. 10
I.2. Metaphor in economics………………………………………………………….. 13
I.3. Metaphor and collocation………………………………………………………… 20
I.4. Other aspects of economics discourse…………………………………………… 22
Chapter II: Some analyses of metaphorical lexis and collocation in English and Vietnamese economics discourse…………………………………………………….
24
II.1. Analysis of Central Bank reports……………………………………………….. 25
II.2. Analysis of newspaper reports on stock market……………………………….. 29
II.3. The importance of collocation………………………………………………….. 37
Chapter III: Discussion on the findings and implications for L2 readers and writers of economics…………………………………………………………………………
43
III.1. Discussion on the role of culture in metaphor………………………………… 43
III.2. Discussion on metaphor, metonymy and the binding of metaphor and metonymy……………………………………………………………………………...
51
III.3. Discussion on the findings of the analysis 65
III.4. Implications for L2 readers and writers of economics…………………........... 69
Part III. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………… 70
References…………………………………………………………………………….. 72
List of Tables and Figures
Tables Page
Table1. Commonly used metaphors in economics……………………………. 14
Table2. Metaphor involving graphs to express increase and decrease………… 16
Table 3a: Expressions of increase, Bank of England Monetary Policy………... 25
Table 3b: Expression of increase, Ng©n hµng Nhµ níc - State Bank of Vietnam…... 26
Table 4a. Expression of decrease, Bank of England…………………………... 27
Table 4b. Expression of decrease, Ng©n hµng Nhµ níc - State Bank of Vietnam……. 27
Table 5: Summary of Conceptual Metaphor Use……………………………… 29
Table 6: Metaphor use in stock market reports: English………………………. 30
Table 7: Metaphor use in stock market reports: Vietnamese………………….. 33
Table 8: Collocation patterns in Ng©n hµng Nhµ níc ViÖt Nam and Economic Reports ……………………………………………………………..
39
Table 9: Collocation patterns in Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee Reports…………………………………………………………………………
40
Table 10: Patterns of nominalisation in Bank of England MPCs……………… 42
Table 11: Collocation Patterns in Cobuild “Bank of English” sub corpus of The Economist…………………………………………………………………
44
Figure
Figure 1a: Conceptual Metaphor………………………………………………. 35
Figure 1b: Conceptual Metaphor………………………………………………. 36
Part I. Introduction
Rationale
As is in many other fields, English is increasingly the universal language of economics discourse, which means that professional and academic economist are obliged to publish in English in order to further their careers. There is evidence to show that the dominance of English in scientific journal writing seems to be increasing ( St. John, 1987), even compared with languages such as Vietnamese. English has clearly become the world’s predominant language of research and scholarship (Swales, 1990). A different angle on this is taken up by Wayt Gibbs (1995), who argues that there seems to be a presumption that work written in coutries where English is not the first language is likely to be linguistically deficient: even journal written in English but from non-English speaking countries appear to be discriminated against publication. Referring to the extreme competition to get published, Swales (1990: p.103) reports manuscript rejection rates as high as 80 -95% in arts and humanities, “ which in turn means increasing pressure on manuscripts that betray evidence of non-standard English.”
The fact that professional journals do not make linguistic concession to authors who are not native speakers of English, nor provide a speacialist editing service to bring their L2 writing up to standard, means that non-L1 English academics have to invest heavily in improving their English language skills on top of their main academic and research duties; in practice this means that specialist translation services as well as ESP teaching are in great demand.
It might be thought that technical texts are relatively straightforward for the specialist non-native speaker to both understand and write, due to an apparent relative absence of metaphor and figurative language, and the frequency of cognate technical terms. If this were the case, the L2 reader-writer might be able to rely considerably on positive L1 transfer when reading or writing directly in English; in the case of translation, a largely literal approach would produce an appropriate equivalence.
However, Halliday ( 1985:329) argues that metaphor is in fact an essential feature of technical writing, and plays an important role in making technical discourse easier to understand. Meanings may be realised by word choice that differs from what is in some sense typical or unmarked, and “ anything approaching technical language for example tends to become noticeably more complex if one simplifies it by removing the metaphors.”
Several authors have pointed out that economics texts are also “ heavily metaphorical” (McCloskey,1983; Mason,1990). When one considers the frequency of widely used terms such as human capital, falling unemployment, demand expansion and contraction, credit flows, accelerating growth rates, liquidity squeeze…, the metaphorical nature of the subjects as it is usually expressed becomes clear, and this leads Hewings ( 1990) to argue that it is misleading to represent economics as rhetoric free.
Aims of the study
This research investigates the extent to which metaphor use in economics differs between English and Vietnamese. It aims specially to investigate:
1. To what extent are the metaphors used in English economics texts mirrored by those used in their Vietnamese equivalents; are different metaphors used, and are there differences in frequency of use?
2. To what extent do the two languages use a different range of lexis to express these metaphors?
Casual observation reveal that certainly some of the underlying or conceptual metaphors used in Economics are cross-lingual, in the sense that the same metaphors are used as vehicles for the same concepts in other languages. Thus markets ( ie. People interacting) are universally modelled by supply and demand “ curves”, and the economy “grows” or “contracts” in many languages. To the extent that this is true, the task facing the L2 writer or the specialist translator is facilitated. However, on the basis the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis positing a determining influence of language on thought, it has been widely argued that different languages to some degree reflect different ways of conceiving of the world and interpreting phenomena. A possible consequence, according to Fasold (1990:52), is that speakers of two different languages may interpret the same discourse profoundly differently. Thus, it would not be surprising if there were some differences in metaphor use between languages, which, if not taken into account, would result in marked and non-native like discourse, possibly leading to rejection by publishers and a consequent brake on career advancement in the case of academic economist, and greater difficulty in understanding texts for the L2 learner.
One of the problems faced by a writer of economics texts, either as original author or translator, is to find different ways to make statements about changes in economic variables, such as “ GDP increased by x percent” or “ inflation decreased by so much last month”. Repetitious use of the same expressions can produce a dull and monotonous text, yet the overuse of less widely used lexis for the sake of variety can produce a text that seems unusual in terms of register mismatch. Moreover, differences between languages in terms of what conceptual metaphors are used, how they are realised lexically and their frequency of use, can cause translators and L2 writers to produce texts that seem marked. In other words, writers working across languages need to have detailed knowledge of metaphor use in the relevant languages. Unsystematic observation of original Vietnamese texts suggests the hypothesis that Vietnamese uses a more limited range of expressions to express increase and decrease, which when translated more or less literally produce a somewhat monotonous sounding text in English. Original English language texts in economics seem to use a wider range of lexis, and also appear to have the facility to express more subtle shades of meaning, by means of expressions such as “ GDP edged up in the 4th Quarter”; “monetary conditions eased a shade after last month’s liquidity squeeze”; “ inflation soared in 2005” and “ employment plummeted”. This paper tests the veracity of this hypothesis.
It has been argued that Vietnamese tends to be more long-winded and elaborate than English thereby making it less concise as a means of expression. Evidence for this is the fact that Vietnamese translations systematically 10% or more longer in words than their English originals. Furthermore, it has been argued that Vietnamese is also less precise as a scientific language.
The study hopes to Giúp writers, readers working across the two languages have a detailed knowledge of metaphor use. The result of the study is considered to be useful to Vietnamese speaking economists reading and writing in English, as well as translators and ESP students.
Scope of the study
It is impossible for a study report to deal with every aspect of language theory and practice in great depth. Therefore, the study is not proposed to cover all of the features of economics discourse. It focuses on the prominent linguistic features revealed through news reports in specialist business newspapers and policy review articles in central banks’ reviews and minutes.
In carrying out the thesis, each linguistic domain in the context of a particular topic will be considered, since lexical, structural and discourse features occur differently depending on the topics being discussed. However, because of time constraints and within the framework of an M.A thesis, our study is limited to news reports from September 2006 to November 2006, and the central banks reports and minutes in 2006.
This research looks at two specific text types within the field of economics: namely, (i) the policy review article, which describe macroeconomic trends retrospectively in terms of policy outcomes, and (ii) the financial market report published in the specialist business newspapers every day.
Methods of the study.
Experimental, quantative and descriptive methods would be mainly used in this study. The reason for choosing these two ones is that the research is carried out under controlled conditions and the data is collected from already existing data sources (Selinger, H.W; Shohamy, E. 2000). As a result, the analytic and deductive techniques would be in use. The advantages of quantative, numerically specifiable - as opposed to structural, symbolically represented - mathematical concepts become evident in all cases where the rigidity of crisp categories and determinate rules do not adequately describe the phenomena observed, i.e. where the variability and vagueness of natural languages cannot be neglected, where mere tendencies and preferences rather than stable relations and structures have to be accounted for, where the forms and principles of dynamic changes reveal more of a functional system in want of explanation than the well understood structural consistency of inadequate models.
In the study, we will accept the data analysis approach proposed by Selinger and Shohamy (2000), that is data obtained from descriptive researchs are generally analysed with the aid of descriptive statistics. These would provide information such as how often the language phenomenon occurs, the typical use of language elements by English and Vietnamese writers, etc.
The steps of the study are as follows:
